Vibranium Substitute
Vibranium Substitute
Taking the density of Vibranium
Substitute being about 3 grams/cc, then a full body suit weighing about the
same as your skin would weight about 9 kilograms, and be about 1.5 millimetres
thick.
The Vibranium Substitute 'armour' is composed of 23 trillion
trillion interlocking nanoscopic coil springs, so when they are impacted by
kinetic attacks (such as a bullet or a fist), then it would compress absorbing
that energy and store it in the winding of the springs.
The theoretical efficiency is probably
only maybe 70% theoretically, and probably only 50-60% in practice.
I will work with 50% efficiency.
Part of the advantage of the
interlocking coil springs is that the pressure (pounds per square inch) is not
such a big deal. Think of instead of the full energy of the impact at only an
area of 0.6 square centimeters, but instead spread over 1.5 meters, it hurts a
lot less. It would only actually have to be spread out the kinetic energy to
about 7 inches diameter to have the full effect.
This is a lot like being beaten with a
phone book, but it is misleading because the phone book imparts a lot more
momentum for the same kinetic energy which causes torsion issues. Average
kinetic energy from a 9 millimeter bullet is about 500 joules. This is about
the same amount of damage you get from jumping off two stairs or the same
amount of walking in 19 mph wind. It's not a big deal because it is spread
across your body, instead of concentrated in one small spot at the base of your
skull. Bullets concentrate that force over a small area, so they hurt and
penetrate more. With the coil springs the area is spread out over a large area,
so the penetration is minimal.
In my example, this would be halved,
as half of the energy would be absorbed by springs, converted into potential
energy stored in the coil spring tension.
Rigidity is the major engineering
restraints to get that to the theoretical maximum of 72% efficiency, mobility
would be severely impaired.
Putting more nanotech as an underlayer
in the form of nanoscale piezo-electric crystals could convert that coil
tension into stored electrical energy. Again 50% efficiency is my working
number.
So a 500 joule bullet, you would take
half the damage, but spread out, no no biggie; a quarter of that can be stored
as electrical energy you could use to store a weapon, and a quarter dissipated
as heat.
Now fine fine, have a suit with a
built in taser, now take that charge to divert that electricity to coil the
springs in a different part of the body. And then release it suddenly in a
contact kinetic attack. Again, I would consider 50% efficiency for easy
numbers.
Put that in the soles of your boots,
and you can have a fun superjump. Or in his hands and he can push that into a
vehicle or wall, with some poppin' results.
How much can that 9 kilogram suit
store? If the Vibranium Substitute is made from coiled Graphene, or more likely
coiled boron nanotube, then it can hold about 22.5 megajoules, about the same
as a kilogram of gasoline or 4 kilograms of TNT.
You would not be able to expel that
much out thru your hands at once, only about 1.5% at a time max per hand. And
that would hurt. That is still like being able to project about 3 ounces of TNT
from your hand.
22 megajoules of storage would also be
after you have been hit with 88,000 bullets, not likely. It does mean one
wicked backhand blast per 10 bullet impacts, that's cool.
One nice side effect is that you could
essentially double the height at which you could jump from safely.
Hyoomons have a maximum standing
vertical leap of about 4 feet, which works out to about 5 m/s. Anyway, that 5
meters per second is about how much that athlete’s legs can absorb with no
damage. Which is unsurprisingly about a jump from 4 feet. Wearing the vibranium
substitute, Jordan could have the same no damage jump from 8 feet.
The maximum speed any human has moved
under their own power was in the long jump, a colossal 13 m/s, which would be
the same as jumping from 28 feet up, yow. I am guessing that barring things
like landing on soft sand or the rolling landing, that is about how much you
can do without dislocating your knees. You're still taking damage, but you can
walk away from it (if you are like the top Olympic long jumper). That is about 7000
Joules, yow ow ow ow.
With the Vibranium Substitute, that same person could walk away from
a leap from 56 feet up. Now we're in jumping from buildings like batman
territory.
This would not make us Batman or Black
Panther, nor even Michael Jordan or Bob Beaman (long jump world record holder),
but it would enhance our performance.
I have an ordinary vertical leap,
about 2 feet, more than good enough for a vicious game of volleyball. That is
measured from the rise in center of gravity, details…math, stuff. So that puts
me at about half of those numbers. So it would mean that if I learned how to
land properly (from years of gymnastics and rock climbing) I could jump
'safely' from about 12 feet up and with the Vibranium Substitute from about 25 feet up.
Note that this does almost nothing to
affect momentum, so you would still be tossed about by big impacts. Being
whacked by a baseball bat and hit by a bullet has the same amount of kinetic
energy, but the bat imparts nearly 17 times more momentum, so it knocks you
back further.
Bullet 10.8 grams, 300 meters per
second
Baseball Bat 3 kilograms, 18 meters
per second
Same kinetic energy, one half mass
times velocity squared so
Bullet kinetic energy is
0.5*0.0108*300*300 = 486joules
Baseball Bat kinetic energy is
0.5*3*18*18 = 486 joules
Bullet momentum mass time velocity so
.0108*300 = 3.24 kg*m/s
Baseball Bat momentum mass time
velocity so 3*18 = 54 kg*m/s
if you weigh 54 kilograms, you will
find yourself moved backwards by the baseball bat at 1m/s, you will stumble
back about 3 feet.
I won't go into how relative density,
energy per square centimeter, and relative hardness affects penetration;
another time. Blah blah blah, math math math, blah blah blah, more of the
bullet's energy goes into penetration, more of the bat's energy goes into
moving you backwards.
This came from someone dissing on the
vibranium in some old movie. I explained how the movie explanation was comic
book magic baby talk, but whatthe suit does is doable with real science. The
science is there and the materials are known in proof of concept in the lab.
We're talking about embedding 9
trillion trillion tiny coil graphene or boron nanotube coil springs into a 9
kilogram suit. Remarkably expensive, but could however be considered reasonable
for a space suit, it is a hazardous environment. For ordinary every day use, I
use grapheme and boron nanotube infused spider silk clothing, it prevents any
ordinary amount of wear and tear and environmental abrasion and blocks most
penetration, and is aesthetically pleasing to the eyes and to the touch.
I am also thinking about a more
ambitious version with some more active nano, so like a 100 kilogram version,
more of an exoskeleton. It would allow you to essentially do the Iron Man drop
from terminal velocity to a dead stop. There would be rigidity related mobility
issues.
There is a precedent for this. Imagine
Bronze Age warrior with actual steel weapons and armour, gifts from the 'gods'.
They would be able to cut a swath of death and be virtually untouchable, almost
like superheroes. Doesn't really eliminated the need for armies, but it makes
the generals/kings much more heroic-ish.
In this case, the chain-mail is
interlinked coil springs, but the principle would be the same.
1.5 millimeters with 2 million layers,
means that a 9 millimeter bullet would spread it's energy out an additional 3
millimeters to its diameter. Only about a 44% reduction in the penetration, but
the coils would absorb more of that energy.
43.75% efficiency would be the bare
minimum efficiency, you can do that without nanotech or vibranium.
If instead of each coil neighboring 12
others, you can have each coil covered by 6 others, and you can spread that
across the entire suit. It would mean a higher density, but that is where you
get the optimal 72% efficiency. It would only work with the coil spring idea,
not really possible for regular chainmail.
There is also the part where the
rigidity will occur where the coils are tensed. Absorb a big enough hit and you
will be unable to move. Preferable to dying.
You don't need to convert all of that
mechanical tension potential energy to electrical energy to transfer it. You
just need a mechanism to cause a given spring (or series of springs) to uncoil
and by that process transfer their tension to neighboring springs. I bet it
tingles and tickles. By this process, you can move the spring tensions to where
you want to expel it.
Probably something simple like a small
electrical charge will cause the unwinding. So long as the neighboring coils
have less tension, they will accept the tension from the manual unwinding. If
the area is isolated so that the other coils do not take the tension, then the
kinetic energy is projected out of the suit.
Although this is really cool, this
means there is the vulnerability that the entire kinetic energy of the suit can
be discharged using a taser. Because of that limitation, perhaps the
piezo-electric to a capacitor bank would work well. Batteries would be too slow
to charge and to slow to discharge. It also means you can manually charge from
a battery or capacitor pack to make your backhand blast. You should still have
a battery pack that you can charge more gradually, so you don't keep things all
pent up in the coils and capacitors, like a cocked gun, not good.
Penetration is determined mostly by
relative hardness (tensile strength) and density. Lead bullets are 11.4 times
the density of skin and are thus dense enough that they penetrate easily. Lead
is 4 times the density of Boron Nitride, but is nearly 3000 times more
hardness/tensile strength. It would take a hell of a hit to penetrate even 1.5
millimeters of the stuff.
Penetration is what makes relatively
low amounts of energy do so much harm to people. I like this, something simple
like clocksprings makes the armour even more resilient than just how strong it
is and without having to resort to rigidity.
Comments
Post a Comment